devi42 ([info]devi42) wrote,
@ 2008-07-17 23:37:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:movies and movie reviews

What if "nice" really was good enough?
Photobucket

When I was a child, I loved Shelly Duvall’s Faerie Tale Theatre – in fact, I still do. I have a handful of episodes spread out over VHS and DVD and I have yet to outgrown their charm. And they are charming – they had to be in order to attract some of the biggest directors and actors of the eighties. Most people who remember the series – and sadly those people are few and far between – remember it fondly. It’s a product of an earlier time, an age when people were still clinging to a belief in magic.

Two decades later, I can’t help but wonder if Shelly Duvall would be able to interest anyone in the pitch for such a show if she were to attempt it tomorrow. No special effects? No action? No big revelations? No plot twists? So what if you can get Steve Carell to play a frog, no one is going to watch.

I would have watched, but then I’m not a film critic.

Tonight I rented Penelope and found it just as sweet and charming as I did when I first saw it in theatres. It’s a good thing I don’t listen to critics. Oh I read movie reviews – love them, in fact – but if I really want to see something, I’ll go in spite of the critics. Penelope, as you’ve probably guessed, didn’t fare too well when sacrificed up to the critic’s alter; this charming little movie got a score of just 48 on metacritic.com.

Wesley Morris wrote in his review for the Boston Globe that ”[Penelope] could have gone in a number of more inspiring allegorical directions but winds up your average bedtime story instead.” What Morris has forgotten is that the world needs bedtime stories and faerie tales. Sometimes the simplest messages – love yourself for who you are, value the person inside – are the ones people need to hear the most.

Penelope is a slightly new twist on an age old tale. It’s not told perfectly but it is told with affection. It stumbles and wanders down a few wrong side streets but it never strays too far from being a nice little movie. Some critics criticized the film’s jumble of visual styles and accents but again, they’re missing the key point – this is a faerie tale. The jumble of styles and characters helps place the story a step out of place with the real world – it could be any city in any country. Yes, it sometimes felt awkward but I think more thought went into those decisions than the filmmakers have been credited with. As for the reviewers and viewers who criticized the film for borrowing visuals from Burton, I’d urge them to check out the work of Edward Gorey – Burton’s great but even he’s not 100% original.

Penelope isn’t a perfect movie but, surrounded by slasher flicks and half-baked comedies , it’s refreshing to see a film that doesn’t aspire to be anything more than a nice bedtime tale. We need more movies like this and, in order for that to happen, we need to give nice little movies half a chance.




(Post a new comment)


[info]stefanie_bean
2008-07-18 03:01 am UTC (link)
You make some interesting points. The '80s and '90s definitely had a lot more "magical" movies. I don't do this anymore (because I value my sanity), but when I used to frequent the LOST forum (the Fuselage), every time there was an episode with mystery in it which couldn't be explained by science, a segment of the fandom would *explode.* It made them furious that someone would have the gall to inject supernatural elements into a show. It's like it personally affronted them.

Excellent point that we *need* fairy tales, bedtime and household tales, just like (I believe) we need "household gods."

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]devi42
2008-07-18 10:14 am UTC (link)
It's so strange because the past decade has all of the Harry Potter movies and half of the HP books. Despite that, I still find it less faerie tale and magic friendly.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]stefanie_bean
2008-07-18 03:06 pm UTC (link)
Harry Potter movies versus Dark Crystal, or even animated films like The Last Unicorn - there's no comparison. Big special effects do not a "magical" movie make.

One recent one (which I liked, anyway) which had more magical qualities was Pan's Labyrinth. Even Del Toro's more straightforward, older sci-fi movies have a tinge of mysticism about them.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]devi42
2008-07-18 03:13 pm UTC (link)
Oh how I love The Last Unicorn. Poor Jeff Bridges. He's always going to Prince Lir to me, no matter what he's in.

I wasn't crazy about Pan's Labyrinth, though I would like to see it again (part of it may have been that there was so much hype surrounding it). I saw HellBoy II last weekend and there was some very nifty things in there - Del Toro seemed to have much more free reign than in the first one.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]ladyprydian
2008-07-18 11:54 am UTC (link)
I don't listen to movie reviews either. I go and see what I want to see. So far my track record has been more on the positive side.

Mind you I usually go with some of my good friends and if we get bord we just start our own Mistery-Science-Theater-3000 like commentary.

Ohh Marie Antoinette, how we heckled you.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]devi42
2008-07-18 02:01 pm UTC (link)
Sometimes my boyfriend and I purposefully rent movies just for the purpose of doing out own MST commentaries. August Rush was especially fun.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…